Feature comparison

Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer) vs JDiskReport

GNOME’s disk usage analyzer for local devices, folders, and online accounts. A Java disk statistics tool with overview charts and detailed tables. See how their platforms, views, and cleanup workflows fit the way you work.

Mixed / ChartsOpen source / Free

Which fits your needs?

Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer): Linux desktop users who prefer a GNOME application with graphical disk analysis.

JDiskReport: Users who want cross-platform disk statistics and already use Java.

Features, pricing, and workflow

Scroll across to compare

FeatureBaobab (Disk Usage Analyzer)JDiskReport
Best fitLinux desktop users who prefer a GNOME application with graphical disk analysis.Users who want cross-platform disk statistics and already use Java.
VisualizationFolder tree with ring/treemap graphical viewsOverview statistics charts and detail tables
Platforms and requirementsLinux (GNOME)macOS, Windows, Linux (Java)
Pricing and editionsFree software from GNOME; available through Flathub/distributions.No-charge, ad-free freeware; this does not mean open source.
Open sourceYesNo
Native macOS UILinux applicationCross-platform interface
Cleanup workflowInspect the selected location and use documented file actions or the system file manager.Use the statistics to guide file review; the cited overview does not specify removal semantics.
Reports and portabilityKeep Baobab for Linux desktop analysis. For a terminal on Linux, NullDisk’s CLI can rescan the same filesystem; its Mac GUI does not import Baobab sessions.Preserve any saved scan files supported by your version and keep important table entries. NullDisk does not import JDiskReport scan files.

Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer): what stands out

A good fit for Linux desktop users who prefer a GNOME application with graphical disk analysis.

Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer): strengths

  • Tree and graphical folder-size views
  • Scans devices, selected folders, and online accounts
  • Free software maintained within GNOME

Considerations

  • A Linux desktop app rather than a native Mac application
  • Remote access depends on available account/backend support
  • A scan inventory is not a backup or deletion recommendation

Full product guide → · Alternatives →

JDiskReport: what stands out

A good fit for users who want cross-platform disk statistics and already use Java.

JDiskReport: strengths

  • Disk usage statistics in charts and tables
  • Runs across Java-capable desktop systems
  • Free without ads or expiry

Considerations

  • Requires a compatible Java runtime
  • Freeware rather than an open-source project
  • Check the manual for report storage and file-management actions

Full product guide → · Alternatives →

For a useful comparison on your own drive, match the scan root, access permissions, and size mode. Chart style changes how you explore the results; it does not by itself establish measurement accuracy.

Common questions

When should I choose Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer)?

A good fit for Linux desktop users who prefer a GNOME application with graphical disk analysis. Free software from GNOME; available through Flathub/distributions.

When should I choose JDiskReport?

A good fit for users who want cross-platform disk statistics and already use Java. No-charge, ad-free freeware; this does not mean open source.

Will both apps show the same size?

Not necessarily. Match the scan root, permissions, exclusions, and logical/allocated-size mode. Hard links, APFS clones, snapshots, sparse files, and cloud placeholders can change totals. A reported size is not a guaranteed amount recovered after deletion.

More comparisons