Feature comparison

Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer) vs DaisyDisk

GNOME’s disk usage analyzer for local devices, folders, and online accounts. A Mac sunburst analyzer with cloud scans and a drag-and-drop collector. See how their platforms, views, and cleanup workflows fit the way you work.

Which fits your needs?

Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer): Linux desktop users who prefer a GNOME application with graphical disk analysis.

DaisyDisk: Mac users who want a sunburst, cloud connections, and snapshot tools.

Features, pricing, and workflow

Scroll across to compare

FeatureBaobab (Disk Usage Analyzer)DaisyDisk
Best fitLinux desktop users who prefer a GNOME application with graphical disk analysis.Mac users who want a sunburst, cloud connections, and snapshot tools.
VisualizationFolder tree with ring/treemap graphical viewsSunburst and file list
Platforms and requirementsLinux (GNOME)macOS
Pricing and editionsFree software from GNOME; available through Flathub/distributions.One-time license; free trial. Check vendor pricing and direct/App Store edition differences.
Open sourceYesNo
Native macOS UILinux applicationYes
Cleanup workflowInspect the selected location and use documented file actions or the system file manager.Collector stages items, then permanently removes them after confirmation and a cancellation countdown. It does not use macOS Trash.
Reports and portabilityKeep Baobab for Linux desktop analysis. For a terminal on Linux, NullDisk’s CLI can rescan the same filesystem; its Mac GUI does not import Baobab sessions.The cited overview does not establish a portable scan-report format. Preserve paths or screenshots and check the current manual before migrating.

Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer): what stands out

A good fit for Linux desktop users who prefer a GNOME application with graphical disk analysis.

Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer): strengths

  • Tree and graphical folder-size views
  • Scans devices, selected folders, and online accounts
  • Free software maintained within GNOME

Considerations

  • A Linux desktop app rather than a native Mac application
  • Remote access depends on available account/backend support
  • A scan inventory is not a backup or deletion recommendation

Full product guide → · Alternatives →

DaisyDisk: what stands out

A good fit for Mac users who want a sunburst, cloud connections, and snapshot tools.

DaisyDisk: strengths

  • Sunburst navigation with Quick Look previews
  • Physical-size accounting for clones and hard links
  • Cloud connections and macOS snapshot management

Considerations

  • Mac app; no Windows or Linux desktop edition
  • Full functionality requires a paid license after trial
  • Some capabilities differ between direct and App Store editions

Full product guide → · Alternatives →

For a useful comparison on your own drive, match the scan root, access permissions, and size mode. Chart style changes how you explore the results; it does not by itself establish measurement accuracy.

Common questions

When should I choose Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer)?

A good fit for Linux desktop users who prefer a GNOME application with graphical disk analysis. Free software from GNOME; available through Flathub/distributions.

When should I choose DaisyDisk?

A good fit for Mac users who want a sunburst, cloud connections, and snapshot tools. One-time license; free trial. Check vendor pricing and direct/App Store edition differences.

Will both apps show the same size?

Not necessarily. Match the scan root, permissions, exclusions, and logical/allocated-size mode. Hard links, APFS clones, snapshots, sparse files, and cloud placeholders can change totals. A reported size is not a guaranteed amount recovered after deletion.

More comparisons