Feature comparison

Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer) vs DeepClean

GNOME’s disk usage analyzer for local devices, folders, and online accounts. A category-based cleaner with developer tools and per-item safety explanations. See how their platforms, views, and cleanup workflows fit the way you work.

Mixed / ListOpen source / Freemium

Which fits your needs?

Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer): Linux desktop users who prefer a GNOME application with graphical disk analysis.

DeepClean: Mac users who want explained cleanup categories and developer-cache coverage.

Features, pricing, and workflow

Scroll across to compare

FeatureBaobab (Disk Usage Analyzer)DeepClean
Best fitLinux desktop users who prefer a GNOME application with graphical disk analysis.Mac users who want explained cleanup categories and developer-cache coverage.
VisualizationFolder tree with ring/treemap graphical viewsCategory and large-file lists with safety ratings
Platforms and requirementsLinux (GNOME)macOS 13+
Pricing and editionsFree software from GNOME; available through Flathub/distributions.Free scan and first gigabyte of cleanup; unlimited cleanup listed at $39 once per Mac.
Open sourceYesNo
Native macOS UILinux applicationYes
Cleanup workflowInspect the selected location and use documented file actions or the system file manager.Select items for Trash; caution items require deliberate selection and acknowledgement.
Reports and portabilityKeep Baobab for Linux desktop analysis. For a terminal on Linux, NullDisk’s CLI can rescan the same filesystem; its Mac GUI does not import Baobab sessions.Retain deletion history and important decisions separately. The product overview does not document importing its records into another analyzer.

Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer): what stands out

A good fit for Linux desktop users who prefer a GNOME application with graphical disk analysis.

Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer): strengths

  • Tree and graphical folder-size views
  • Scans devices, selected folders, and online accounts
  • Free software maintained within GNOME

Considerations

  • A Linux desktop app rather than a native Mac application
  • Remote access depends on available account/backend support
  • A scan inventory is not a backup or deletion recommendation

Full product guide → · Alternatives →

DeepClean: what stands out

A good fit for Mac users who want explained cleanup categories and developer-cache coverage.

DeepClean: strengths

  • Safe/Review/Caution categories and item explanations
  • Developer toolchain cleanup and content-matched duplicates
  • Trash-first cleanup with deletion history

Considerations

  • Unlimited cleanup requires a paid per-Mac license
  • Category judgments still depend on your workflow
  • Primarily category-based cleanup rather than a disk map

Full product guide → · Alternatives →

For a useful comparison on your own drive, match the scan root, access permissions, and size mode. Chart style changes how you explore the results; it does not by itself establish measurement accuracy.

Common questions

When should I choose Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer)?

A good fit for Linux desktop users who prefer a GNOME application with graphical disk analysis. Free software from GNOME; available through Flathub/distributions.

When should I choose DeepClean?

A good fit for Mac users who want explained cleanup categories and developer-cache coverage. Free scan and first gigabyte of cleanup; unlimited cleanup listed at $39 once per Mac.

Will both apps show the same size?

Not necessarily. Match the scan root, permissions, exclusions, and logical/allocated-size mode. Hard links, APFS clones, snapshots, sparse files, and cloud placeholders can change totals. A reported size is not a guaranteed amount recovered after deletion.

More comparisons