正面对决
| SimplyDiskSweeper | SpacePeek | |
|---|---|---|
| Visualization | List | List |
| Platform | macOS | macOS |
| Pricing | Free Free with paid App Store options at time of writing | Freemium Free tier; Pro is a cheap one-time unlock |
| Open source | No | No |
| Native Mac | Yes | Yes |
2026年9月更新 · 价格会变,请以供应商为准。
SimplyDiskSweeper
A minimal sorted-list cleaner for quick disk sweeps.
＋ SimplyDiskSweeper: 优点
- Dead-simple sorted lists — no learning curve
- Fast for routine sweeps of Downloads and caches
- Lightweight indie app
－ SimplyDiskSweeper: 缺点
- No visual map for understanding usage at a glance
- Minimal safety rails and no staged collector
- Not suited to deep forensic cleanups
阅读评测: SimplyDiskSweeper → · SimplyDiskSweeper 查看替代品 →
SpacePeek
A read-only Quick Look inspector for folders and archives.
＋ SpacePeek: 优点
- Read-only by design — it cannot delete anything, so it's extra safe
- Peeks inside folders and archives with Finder-style Quick Look
- Very cheap Pro unlock
－ SpacePeek: 缺点
- Read-only means no cleanup workflow at all
- No sunburst or treemap overview of a whole drive
- Niche tool, not a full disk analyzer
阅读评测: SpacePeek → · SpacePeek 查看替代品 →
结论: SimplyDiskSweeper vs SpacePeek
Choose SimplyDiskSweeper if you want list visualization on macOS. Choose SpacePeek if you prefer list views at freemium pricing on macOS. And if you want a native Mac sunburst with a staged collector and zero telemetry, NullDisk is the third option that beats both on workflow.
常见问题
Which is better, SimplyDiskSweeper or SpacePeek?
SimplyDiskSweeper wins on list visualization for macOS; SpacePeek wins on list views for macOS. On price, Free (SimplyDiskSweeper) vs Freemium (SpacePeek). The honest answer depends on your OS and whether you prefer maps or lists — read the verdict below.
Is there something better than both?
If you want a native Mac sunburst with allocated-size honesty, a staged removal collector, and zero data collection, NullDisk beats both on workflow — even where SimplyDiskSweeper or SpacePeek wins on price.