직접 비교
| LumaDisk | SpacePeek | |
|---|---|---|
| Visualization | Sunburst | List |
| Platform | macOS + Windows | macOS |
| Pricing | Paid Paid one-time purchase (around $7 at time of writing) | Freemium Free tier; Pro is a cheap one-time unlock |
| Open source | No | No |
| Native Mac | No | Yes |
2026년 9월 업데이트 · 가격은 변동됩니다. 제공업체에서 확인하세요.
LumaDisk
A light-speed sunburst that turns your filesystem into light.
+ LumaDisk: 강점
- Modern sunburst visualization on both Mac and Windows
- Fast scans with a clean, contemporary interface
- Affordable one-time price
- LumaDisk: 약점
- Cross-platform toolkit feel rather than fully native Mac UI
- Newer app with a shorter track record than incumbents
- Cleanup tooling is lighter than specialist cleaners
리뷰 읽기: LumaDisk → · LumaDisk 대안 보기 →
SpacePeek
A read-only Quick Look inspector for folders and archives.
+ SpacePeek: 강점
- Read-only by design — it cannot delete anything, so it's extra safe
- Peeks inside folders and archives with Finder-style Quick Look
- Very cheap Pro unlock
- SpacePeek: 약점
- Read-only means no cleanup workflow at all
- No sunburst or treemap overview of a whole drive
- Niche tool, not a full disk analyzer
리뷰 읽기: SpacePeek → · SpacePeek 대안 보기 →
결론: LumaDisk vs SpacePeek
Choose LumaDisk if you want sunburst visualization on macOS + Windows. Choose SpacePeek if you prefer list views at freemium pricing on macOS. And if you want a native Mac sunburst with a staged collector and zero telemetry, NullDisk is the third option that beats both on workflow.
자주 묻는 질문
Which is better, LumaDisk or SpacePeek?
LumaDisk wins on sunburst visualization for macOS + Windows; SpacePeek wins on list views for macOS. On price, Paid (LumaDisk) vs Freemium (SpacePeek). The honest answer depends on your OS and whether you prefer maps or lists — read the verdict below.
Is there something better than both?
If you want a native Mac sunburst with allocated-size honesty, a staged removal collector, and zero data collection, NullDisk beats both on workflow — even where LumaDisk or SpacePeek wins on price.