직접 비교
| DiskPoint | DissectMac | |
|---|---|---|
| Visualization | Treemap | Treemap |
| Platform | macOS + Windows + Linux | macOS |
| Pricing | Free Free with a privacy-focused offline stance | Freemium Free tier with paid unlocks at time of writing |
| Open source | No | No |
| Native Mac | No | Yes |
2026년 9월 업데이트 · 가격은 변동됩니다. 제공업체에서 확인하세요.
DiskPoint
Privacy-focused free cleanup with offline visualization.
+ DiskPoint: 강점
- Free on three desktop platforms
- Offline analysis with a privacy-first pitch
- DaisyDisk-style cleanup flow without the price
- DiskPoint: 약점
- Qt-based UI feels cross-platform rather than native Mac
- Smaller team and thinner support resources
- Visualization polish trails the category leaders
리뷰 읽기: DiskPoint → · DiskPoint 대안 보기 →
DissectMac
A fast local treemap with uninstaller and live monitoring.
+ DissectMac: 강점
- Fast local treemaps with live disk monitoring
- Bundled uninstaller covers app leftovers
- Free tier for basic analysis
- DissectMac: 약점
- Treemap-only visualization; no sunburst or list-first mode
- Monitoring features overlap with free macOS tools
- Young product with a thin review record
리뷰 읽기: DissectMac → · DissectMac 대안 보기 →
결론: DiskPoint vs DissectMac
Choose DiskPoint if you want treemap visualization on macOS + Windows + Linux. Choose DissectMac if you prefer treemap views at freemium pricing on macOS. And if you want a native Mac sunburst with a staged collector and zero telemetry, NullDisk is the third option that beats both on workflow.
자주 묻는 질문
Which is better, DiskPoint or DissectMac?
DiskPoint wins on treemap visualization for macOS + Windows + Linux; DissectMac wins on treemap views for macOS. On price, Free (DiskPoint) vs Freemium (DissectMac). The honest answer depends on your OS and whether you prefer maps or lists — read the verdict below.
Is there something better than both?
If you want a native Mac sunburst with allocated-size honesty, a staged removal collector, and zero data collection, NullDisk beats both on workflow — even where DiskPoint or DissectMac wins on price.