직접 비교
| diCleaner | JDiskReport | |
|---|---|---|
| Visualization | List | Charts |
| Platform | macOS | Windows + Mac + Linux (Java) |
| Pricing | Free Free on the Mac App Store at time of writing | Free Free of charge from JGoodies |
| Open source | No | No |
| Native Mac | Yes | No |
2026년 9월 업데이트 · 가격은 변동됩니다. 제공업체에서 확인하세요.
diCleaner
A free all-in-one cleaner with analyzer and menu monitoring.
＋ diCleaner: 강점
- Free entry point covering analyzer, junk, and duplicates
- Menu-bar monitoring for ongoing awareness
- Simple enough for first-time cleaners
－ diCleaner: 약점
- All-in-one breadth over analyzer depth
- Free cleaners monetize attention — check the upsell path
- No standout visualization for understanding usage
리뷰 읽기: diCleaner → · diCleaner 대안 보기 →
JDiskReport
Java statistics charts that find your most obsolete folders.
＋ JDiskReport: 강점
- Rich statistics: size, age, and file-type distributions
- Free on every Java-capable platform
- Top-50 lists answer 'what's biggest' instantly
－ JDiskReport: 약점
- Java UI feels alien on a modern Mac
- No deletion workflow — analysis only
- Aging codebase with infrequent updates
리뷰 읽기: JDiskReport → · JDiskReport 대안 보기 →
결론: diCleaner vs JDiskReport
Choose diCleaner if you want list visualization on macOS. Choose JDiskReport if you prefer charts views for free on Windows + Mac + Linux (Java). And if you want a native Mac sunburst with a staged collector and zero telemetry, NullDisk is the third option that beats both on workflow.
자주 묻는 질문
Which is better, diCleaner or JDiskReport?
diCleaner wins on list visualization for macOS; JDiskReport wins on charts views for Windows + Mac + Linux (Java). On price, Free (diCleaner) vs Free (JDiskReport). The honest answer depends on your OS and whether you prefer maps or lists — read the verdict below.
Is there something better than both?
If you want a native Mac sunburst with allocated-size honesty, a staged removal collector, and zero data collection, NullDisk beats both on workflow — even where diCleaner or JDiskReport wins on price.