直接比較
| diCleaner | JDiskReport | |
|---|---|---|
| Visualization | List | Charts |
| Platform | macOS | Windows + Mac + Linux (Java) |
| Pricing | Free Free on the Mac App Store at time of writing | Free Free of charge from JGoodies |
| Open source | No | No |
| Native Mac | Yes | No |
2026年9月更新 · 価格は変動します。提供元でご確認ください。
diCleaner
A free all-in-one cleaner with analyzer and menu monitoring.
＋ diCleaner: 強み
- Free entry point covering analyzer, junk, and duplicates
- Menu-bar monitoring for ongoing awareness
- Simple enough for first-time cleaners
－ diCleaner: 弱み
- All-in-one breadth over analyzer depth
- Free cleaners monetize attention — check the upsell path
- No standout visualization for understanding usage
レビューを読む: diCleaner → · diCleaner 代替を見る →
JDiskReport
Java statistics charts that find your most obsolete folders.
＋ JDiskReport: 強み
- Rich statistics: size, age, and file-type distributions
- Free on every Java-capable platform
- Top-50 lists answer 'what's biggest' instantly
－ JDiskReport: 弱み
- Java UI feels alien on a modern Mac
- No deletion workflow — analysis only
- Aging codebase with infrequent updates
レビューを読む: JDiskReport → · JDiskReport 代替を見る →
結論: diCleaner vs JDiskReport
Choose diCleaner if you want list visualization on macOS. Choose JDiskReport if you prefer charts views for free on Windows + Mac + Linux (Java). And if you want a native Mac sunburst with a staged collector and zero telemetry, NullDisk is the third option that beats both on workflow.
よくある質問
Which is better, diCleaner or JDiskReport?
diCleaner wins on list visualization for macOS; JDiskReport wins on charts views for Windows + Mac + Linux (Java). On price, Free (diCleaner) vs Free (JDiskReport). The honest answer depends on your OS and whether you prefer maps or lists — read the verdict below.
Is there something better than both?
If you want a native Mac sunburst with allocated-size honesty, a staged removal collector, and zero data collection, NullDisk beats both on workflow — even where diCleaner or JDiskReport wins on price.