直接比較
| Delve | JDiskReport | |
|---|---|---|
| Visualization | Mixed | Charts |
| Platform | macOS | Windows + Mac + Linux (Java) |
| Pricing | Paid Paid one-time purchase (around $5 at time of writing) | Free Free of charge from JGoodies |
| Open source | No | No |
| Native Mac | Yes | No |
2026年9月更新 · 価格は変動します。提供元でご確認ください。
Delve
An honest APFS-aware treemap plus sunburst with collector cleanup.
＋ Delve: 強み
- Both treemap and sunburst views with APFS-aware measurement
- Collector tray stages deletions before they happen
- Honest marketing about what can and can't be reclaimed
－ Delve: 弱み
- Newer entrant — fewer reviews and community resources
- macOS only, no Windows or mobile companion
- Smaller feature surface than all-in-one suites
レビューを読む: Delve → · Delve 代替を見る →
JDiskReport
Java statistics charts that find your most obsolete folders.
＋ JDiskReport: 強み
- Rich statistics: size, age, and file-type distributions
- Free on every Java-capable platform
- Top-50 lists answer 'what's biggest' instantly
－ JDiskReport: 弱み
- Java UI feels alien on a modern Mac
- No deletion workflow — analysis only
- Aging codebase with infrequent updates
レビューを読む: JDiskReport → · JDiskReport 代替を見る →
結論: Delve vs JDiskReport
Choose Delve if you want mixed visualization on macOS. Choose JDiskReport if you prefer charts views for free on Windows + Mac + Linux (Java). And if you want a native Mac sunburst with a staged collector and zero telemetry, NullDisk is the third option that beats both on workflow.
よくある質問
Which is better, Delve or JDiskReport?
Delve wins on mixed visualization for macOS; JDiskReport wins on charts views for Windows + Mac + Linux (Java). On price, Paid (Delve) vs Free (JDiskReport). The honest answer depends on your OS and whether you prefer maps or lists — read the verdict below.
Is there something better than both?
If you want a native Mac sunburst with allocated-size honesty, a staged removal collector, and zero data collection, NullDisk beats both on workflow — even where Delve or JDiskReport wins on price.