Feature comparison

diCleaner vs LumaDisk

A free Mac maintenance suite with storage analysis, duplicates, and app management. A Rust/GPUI analyzer with two maps, build-cache detection, and duplicate tools. See how their platforms, views, and cleanup workflows fit the way you work.

Which fits your needs?

diCleaner: Mac users seeking free storage analysis alongside broader maintenance tools.

LumaDisk: Mac/Windows users wanting maps, duplicates, and build-cache discovery.

Features, pricing, and workflow

Scroll across to compare

FeaturediCleanerLumaDisk
Best fitMac users seeking free storage analysis alongside broader maintenance tools.Mac/Windows users wanting maps, duplicates, and build-cache discovery.
VisualizationStorage overview, file categories, and maintenance listsSunburst, treemap, duplicate and unused-file lists
Platforms and requirementsmacOS 11.5+macOS (Apple Silicon), Windows
Pricing and editionsVendor says free to use with all current features included.Seven-day full trial; scanning stays free. Vendor lists $6.89 once for the remaining features.
Open sourceNoNo
Native macOS UIYesCross-platform interface
Cleanup workflowNo automatic deletion after scanning; most tools use Trash by default. Secure Remove and Trash emptying are permanent.Queue selected items for removal; review the current app’s confirmation and recovery options.
Reports and portabilityThe cited pages do not establish scan-report export. Keep any important history or paths before rescanning; retain the original files until decisions are verified.The cited page does not establish scan-report export. Preserve paths and selections before starting a fresh scan in NullDisk.

diCleaner: what stands out

A good fit for Mac users seeking free storage analysis alongside broader maintenance tools.

diCleaner: strengths

  • Storage analysis, large/old files, and duplicate/similar-photo tools
  • App uninstallation, leftovers, and startup-item review
  • Selection-based cleanup with Trash defaults for most tools

Considerations

  • Permanent removal and privacy tools have different effects from Trash
  • App Store privacy disclosure lists some non-linked data
  • Cleanup eligibility depends on files, apps, and permissions

Full product guide → · Alternatives →

LumaDisk: what stands out

A good fit for Mac/Windows users wanting maps, duplicates, and build-cache discovery.

LumaDisk: strengths

  • Sunburst and treemap with live scan updates
  • Build-cache radar, duplicate groups, and unused-file lists
  • OneDrive/Dropbox connections; iCloud through its local folder

Considerations

  • Verify Mac CPU support; current site highlights Apple Silicon
  • Features beyond scanning require an unlock after trial
  • Google Drive is listed as coming soon

Full product guide → · Alternatives →

For a useful comparison on your own drive, match the scan root, access permissions, and size mode. Chart style changes how you explore the results; it does not by itself establish measurement accuracy.

Common questions

When should I choose diCleaner?

A good fit for Mac users seeking free storage analysis alongside broader maintenance tools. Vendor says free to use with all current features included.

When should I choose LumaDisk?

A good fit for Mac/Windows users wanting maps, duplicates, and build-cache discovery. Seven-day full trial; scanning stays free. Vendor lists $6.89 once for the remaining features.

Will both apps show the same size?

Not necessarily. Match the scan root, permissions, exclusions, and logical/allocated-size mode. Hard links, APFS clones, snapshots, sparse files, and cloud placeholders can change totals. A reported size is not a guaranteed amount recovered after deletion.

More comparisons