Feature comparison

Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer) vs SimplyDiskSweeper

GNOME’s disk usage analyzer for local devices, folders, and online accounts. A folder browser ranked by allocated space, with confirmed Trash removal. See how their platforms, views, and cleanup workflows fit the way you work.

Mixed / ListOpen source / Paid

Which fits your needs?

Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer): Linux desktop users who prefer a GNOME application with graphical disk analysis.

SimplyDiskSweeper: Mac users who want a focused list workflow and explicit confirmation.

Features, pricing, and workflow

Scroll across to compare

FeatureBaobab (Disk Usage Analyzer)SimplyDiskSweeper
Best fitLinux desktop users who prefer a GNOME application with graphical disk analysis.Mac users who want a focused list workflow and explicit confirmation.
VisualizationFolder tree with ring/treemap graphical viewsSize-ranked folder hierarchy and filters
Platforms and requirementsLinux (GNOME)macOS
Pricing and editionsFree software from GNOME; available through Flathub/distributions.US Mac App Store lists $14.99 upfront; one-time purchase.
Open sourceYesNo
Native macOS UILinux applicationYes
Cleanup workflowInspect the selected location and use documented file actions or the system file manager.Moves only selected items to macOS Trash after confirmation.
Reports and portabilityKeep Baobab for Linux desktop analysis. For a terminal on Linux, NullDisk’s CLI can rescan the same filesystem; its Mac GUI does not import Baobab sessions.The official page does not establish scan export. Keep useful paths before rescanning; permission scope can make totals differ.

Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer): what stands out

A good fit for Linux desktop users who prefer a GNOME application with graphical disk analysis.

Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer): strengths

  • Tree and graphical folder-size views
  • Scans devices, selected folders, and online accounts
  • Free software maintained within GNOME

Considerations

  • A Linux desktop app rather than a native Mac application
  • Remote access depends on available account/backend support
  • A scan inventory is not a backup or deletion recommendation

Full product guide → · Alternatives →

SimplyDiskSweeper: what stands out

A good fit for Mac users who want a focused list workflow and explicit confirmation.

SimplyDiskSweeper: strengths

  • Largest accessible items shown first
  • Folder hierarchy browsing and filtering
  • Selected items move to Trash after confirmation

Considerations

  • Paid upfront rather than a free edition
  • Measures accessible items within the selected folder
  • Ranked browsing rather than a whole-drive graphical map

Full product guide → · Alternatives →

For a useful comparison on your own drive, match the scan root, access permissions, and size mode. Chart style changes how you explore the results; it does not by itself establish measurement accuracy.

Common questions

When should I choose Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer)?

A good fit for Linux desktop users who prefer a GNOME application with graphical disk analysis. Free software from GNOME; available through Flathub/distributions.

When should I choose SimplyDiskSweeper?

A good fit for Mac users who want a focused list workflow and explicit confirmation. US Mac App Store lists $14.99 upfront; one-time purchase.

Will both apps show the same size?

Not necessarily. Match the scan root, permissions, exclusions, and logical/allocated-size mode. Hard links, APFS clones, snapshots, sparse files, and cloud placeholders can change totals. A reported size is not a guaranteed amount recovered after deletion.

More comparisons