Direktvergleich
| Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer) | diCleaner | |
|---|---|---|
| Visualization | Rings | List |
| Platform | Linux | macOS |
| Pricing | Open source Free and open source (GPL-2.0+) with GNOME | Free Free on the Mac App Store at time of writing |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Native Mac | No | Yes |
Stand September 2026 · Preise ändern sich — bitte beim Anbieter prüfen.
Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer)
GNOME's simple ring-chart scanner for Linux boxes.
+ Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer): Stärken
- Simple ring charts plus treemap and tree views
- Preinstalled on many Linux distributions
- Free and open source forever
- Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer): Schwächen
- Not a Mac app — irrelevant for macOS-only households
- Basic compared with dedicated Mac analyzers
- No cleanup workflow beyond opening folders
Testbericht lesen: Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer) → · Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer) Alternativen ansehen →
diCleaner
A free all-in-one cleaner with analyzer and menu monitoring.
+ diCleaner: Stärken
- Free entry point covering analyzer, junk, and duplicates
- Menu-bar monitoring for ongoing awareness
- Simple enough for first-time cleaners
- diCleaner: Schwächen
- All-in-one breadth over analyzer depth
- Free cleaners monetize attention — check the upsell path
- No standout visualization for understanding usage
Testbericht lesen: diCleaner → · diCleaner Alternativen ansehen →
Fazit: Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer) vs diCleaner
Choose Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer) if you want rings visualization with open-source transparency on Linux. Choose diCleaner if you prefer list views for free on macOS. And if you want a native Mac sunburst with a staged collector and zero telemetry, NullDisk is the third option that beats both on workflow.
Häufige Fragen
Which is better, Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer) or diCleaner?
Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer) wins on rings visualization for Linux; diCleaner wins on list views for macOS. On price, Open source (Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer)) vs Free (diCleaner). The honest answer depends on your OS and whether you prefer maps or lists — read the verdict below.
Is there something better than both?
If you want a native Mac sunburst with allocated-size honesty, a staged removal collector, and zero data collection, NullDisk beats both on workflow — even where Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer) or diCleaner wins on price.
More comparisons
- DaisyDisk vs diCleaner →
- DaisyDisk vs Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer) →
- GrandPerspective vs diCleaner →
- GrandPerspective vs Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer) →
- OmniDiskSweeper vs diCleaner →
- OmniDiskSweeper vs Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer) →
- Disk Inventory X vs diCleaner →
- Disk Inventory X vs Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer) →