Which fits your needs?
Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer): Linux desktop users who prefer a GNOME application with graphical disk analysis.
SquirrelDisk: People wanting a free open-source GUI across desktop systems and remote storage.
Features, pricing, and workflow
Scroll across to compare
| Feature | Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer) | SquirrelDisk |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Linux desktop users who prefer a GNOME application with graphical disk analysis. | People wanting a free open-source GUI across desktop systems and remote storage. |
| Visualization | Folder tree with ring/treemap graphical views | Sunburst, treemap, file list, and duplicates |
| Platforms and requirements | Linux (GNOME) | macOS, Windows, Linux |
| Pricing and editions | Free software from GNOME; available through Flathub/distributions. | Free; AGPL-3.0 source published on GitHub. |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Native macOS UI | Linux application | Cross-platform interface |
| Cleanup workflow | Inspect the selected location and use documented file actions or the system file manager. | Collector offers Trash, permanent removal, secure erase, or backup before deletion. |
| Reports and portability | Keep Baobab for Linux desktop analysis. For a terminal on Linux, NullDisk’s CLI can rescan the same filesystem; its Mac GUI does not import Baobab sessions. | The current overview does not establish an interoperable scan-report format. Preserve paths, duplicate decisions, and remote source settings separately. |
Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer): what stands out
A good fit for Linux desktop users who prefer a GNOME application with graphical disk analysis.
Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer): strengths
- Tree and graphical folder-size views
- Scans devices, selected folders, and online accounts
- Free software maintained within GNOME
Considerations
- A Linux desktop app rather than a native Mac application
- Remote access depends on available account/backend support
- A scan inventory is not a backup or deletion recommendation
SquirrelDisk: what stands out
A good fit for people wanting a free open-source GUI across desktop systems and remote storage.
SquirrelDisk: strengths
- Live maps and a staged removal collector
- Content-based duplicate search
- SSH and rclone-backed cloud storage
Considerations
- Uses a cross-platform Rust interface rather than SwiftUI
- Permanent deletion and secure erase require deliberate review
- Cloud/SSH actions depend on provider and remote-system support
For a useful comparison on your own drive, match the scan root, access permissions, and size mode. Chart style changes how you explore the results; it does not by itself establish measurement accuracy.
Common questions
When should I choose Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer)?
A good fit for Linux desktop users who prefer a GNOME application with graphical disk analysis. Free software from GNOME; available through Flathub/distributions.
When should I choose SquirrelDisk?
A good fit for people wanting a free open-source GUI across desktop systems and remote storage. Free; AGPL-3.0 source published on GitHub.
Will both apps show the same size?
Not necessarily. Match the scan root, permissions, exclusions, and logical/allocated-size mode. Hard links, APFS clones, snapshots, sparse files, and cloud placeholders can change totals. A reported size is not a guaranteed amount recovered after deletion.
More comparisons
- DaisyDisk vs SquirrelDisk →
- DaisyDisk vs Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer) →
- GrandPerspective vs SquirrelDisk →
- GrandPerspective vs Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer) →
- OmniDiskSweeper vs SquirrelDisk →
- OmniDiskSweeper vs Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer) →
- Disk Inventory X vs SquirrelDisk →
- Disk Inventory X vs Baobab (Disk Usage Analyzer) →